The Dutch have expressed their opinions. It is now for its correct interpretation

1

What I “like” operated in the manual mode of Western democracy, so it is their unsinkability.

Strange as it was in Soviet times, I was more inclined to think that the West has at least some rudiments of democracy. But after the collapse of the Soviet Union, I every year more and more convinced that any democracy in the Western world can not speak – it simply was never there, and never will in the foreseeable future.

For democracy in the West issued ordinary fascism, subjected to cosmetic repairs.

And what kind of democracy can one speak in the countries that have reached his present prosperity through doing for many centuries living off the earnings of hard pumping resources from their numerous colonies, which is hundreds of times on its territory and the population of metropolis?

Officially, the colonial system collapsed in 1960.

I believe that it has not collapsed and moved from one state to another, but essentially worsened the situation of the countries, former colonies.

If they were completely dependent, physically, politically, economically and morally from their mother countries, at the present time the former colonies, having formally independent political status, have become more dependent on economically from their, like the former owners.

Our world is arranged so that without the poor the rich cannot exist a priori.

Here and now, when the citizens of Holland had said “no” to Ukraine’s Association agreement with the European Union, the moment of truth for the Western democracy – the CORRECT interpretation of the opinion of the Dutch.

What is there to interpret, You say – once the Dutch said “no” means “no”. But You do not hurry, dear friends, just as any mathematician can prove that twice two is five, and any Western strategist able to turn “no” into “Yes”.

Голландцы высказали своё мнение. Теперь дело за его правильным истолкованием

Don’t believe? Well, then let’s read that on this account already speak Western “free” press.

So, the Financial Times writes: “since the turnout at a meeting held Wednesday in the Netherlands the referendum, whether to approve the Association agreement between the EU and Ukraine amounted to slightly above 30%, attempt to learn the lessons of this vote WOULD be CONTRARY to COMMON SENSE”.

As it is written! Huh?

(It should be noted that a minimum turnout threshold for the recognition of the referendum was exceeded by more than two percent, despite the fact that the number of polling stations was much lower than usual, and that the authorities did not bother warn their citizens that they are entitled to vote only at the polling place of residence. If not for these “little tricks”, the turnout would be much higher)

That’s all – worthless in the market day up to the Dutch referendum and the whole Western democracy. What the hell is democracy, which prefers established in the country the laws of common sense?

That is, by and large, the so-called “Western democracy” operates on the principle of REVOLUTIONARY NECESSITY – “it is necessary, Fedja, is necessary!”

And concepts such as “revolutionary necessity” and “democracy” are incompatible not only in moral but also in “mathematical” terms…

________________

Two more of my articles on this subject:

Still, the Dutch told Ukraine, “no”

The Dutch authorities did everything possible to get the desired result in the referendum

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here