The Duma is concerned: it is already divided before future elections

0

Дума волнуется: в ней уже вовсю делят места перед будущими выборами

The Duma is concerned: it is already divided before future elections. It is divided: the views of the voters here are not particularly taken into account. The parties agree among themselves how to allocate the seats, who put on a traversed list of who to let in single-mandate constituency, and who float freely: you, they say, will be with us for fair elections, is not right.
Show full…

Hot Duma envious looks every bit as Pro-Kremlin, but still missing her party. A lot of them: “homeland”, “Patriots of Russia”, “Civic platform” is one of those that went up over our desert landscape. They too want to warm at least a couple of chairs, but the thing: they have nothing to offer neither voters, nor the Kremlin.

The only asset in their case — name. Not “single”, not “Fair”, and a new and, at first glance, nastasino. This is their chance at their expense Duma can “updated”, they say, and we in the power rotation, see: a new political force!

However, everyone understands that these “new forces” competing with quite a old parliamentary one and the same piece of the pie: the notorious 86%. Of course, in fact they are not 86%. Whatever the numbers, nor was rocked us polls, it is clear that there is still Crimea euphoria that Syria does not care about the minds, as the prices in a nearby store, and the discontent is increasing day by day.

No matter where you throw will be either truckers with those mounts or destitute a million (or two?) man, the last hope writing, calling, knocking, Scratchin ‘ the “straight line” to the President. It is not 86%, they lost faith that they can help someone, in addition to a higher power with the tops of the Kremlin towers. But nevertheless, the ruling party still fighting for the same people.

Exactly why any “Patriots” and “Platforms” in the Duma many places will not give, who will tear off from themselves and cut off a living?

The main mistake of the government that it has no intention to conquer the conditional 20%, which faded traditional meats of abbreviations ARCHPR had long been attracted. If you summarize, those who are “strange desires”, but simply new, can be called middle class.

These people understand that the state in its current form is nothing they will not. Understand that they are going to play in two old and dangerous game: patriotism and populism. First: “Unite! Enemy at the door”. Second: “Take and share!”.

Those who earns, who studied for it and learn who, even if not following a policy, wants to live in a European country, they do not see their representatives in government. Authority about them and thinks is a minority.

Nevertheless, this minority is always moving forward and the country’s history.

What are we now? The Duma, like the elephant, their party on four legs, differing only in thickness, runs briskly into the abyss. All the legs move according to the beat. After the elections of the feet may be more — say, seven. It will not be an elephant, and some octopus, but the direction he won’t change, because the minority middle class continues to be will not be represented.

Worried about this power? Unlikely. But the rake is known. Tell me, how, in your opinion, is it correct reflects our situation here with this phrase: “What is middle class? All. He was still politically? Nothing. What he requires? To become something”?

For me — fits perfectly. The middle class is repeatedly damned propaganda “treacly” — generates new ideas, develops the economy, and it is in response to your request to “become something”, to get a simple representation (not even most) in the power, hears from Duma: laws about shooting at the women, ban on travel to certain countries, another censorship innovations. To plug the Internet is a blow to those who are not represented in the Duma. To forbid meetings — they hold the mouth. Police to purchase water cannon, optical sights, to jail activists and kick out the politicians clearly explain where in Russia the place of those who the authorities don’t need, who to his misfortune, has his own head on his shoulders.

But back to this phrase: “What is middle class? All. He was still politically? Nothing. What he requires? To become something”.

It didn’t come from me, I only replaced it in two words: “third estate” to “middle class”. And so the Abbot Sees, France, late eighteenth century. Before the revolution remained a few months, Robespierre had already burned a verb, and Dr. Gillotin observed the cervical vertebrae.

The problem was that the government did not want to hear the third estate. It never got their rights, even for a second, before he could offer the country an alternative between absolute monarchy and dictatorship “friends”.

Exactly same story happened to us in 1917: the rapid decline after a short February in endless October.

History teaches that teaches nothing. Power instead of giving the floor to all sections of society, he refuses to see his chief assistant is the third estate, the middle class. This is because he has something to lose, that he is afraid and does not want revolution and rebellion.

Only he can be the key to the country’s stability — and its (his!) instead, blaming the rocking of boats, the preparation of the Maidan and God knows what else.

When the crisis finally out of fridge and will take over the country, 86% are not going to support “their” party of the Duma: they did not vote for them, but out of habit at best. But mostly under orders, under orders from above, calmly putting a tick or any other sign.

A conscious choice made by those who has something, who is it earned, — and them of that choice and depriving.

Listen again to the Abbot Sies. It does not require all at once: he wants the third estate, the middle class has become something. It’s not so much: the monarch remains on the throne, but to live and give to others. Not shoot, they are not planted, they are given to earn money and sometimes, they just give there and ride. And speaking in Parliament about what they want.

Where here “potrazivanje foundations”? Apparently, in the infringement of absolute power. You don’t want? “United France” will not yield a single inch? Not a question. Then welcome, comrade Girkin, nee Robespierre, your word. And finally call Dr. Gilotina, his Majesty from the noise of the crowd under the Windows of the Palace headache.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here