Serfdom – Russian tradition?

7

Крепостное право - российская традиция?

State media, deputies and officials in a voice call, a new draft law “On enforcement proceedings”, which entered into force on 1 October, is very liberal.

They claim that helped the Russians life, after partially (and very slightly) corrected their own mistakes.

However, even to these they say should be treated very carefully.

So, on October 1, the strap, after which the citizen of the Russian Federation may be temporarily banned from traveling abroad, is 30 thousand rubles accumulated debt, which is engaged in Federal service of court bailiffs (FSSP). However, as always in the Russian legislation, then immediately followed by a clause.

If the debt is not paid within 2 months, that limit will decrease to 10 thousand rubles. The same amount of “cut-off” from trips abroad will continue to operate for those who have debts for alimony, compensation of harm to health, property or moral damage.

Different well-wishers tried hard to lighten the lives of Russians and, for example, to cancel the right of a bailiff to suspend the driver’s license.

However, before such “liberalism,” the Russian state Duma has not yet reached.

It is only in 2015 have added to the legislation the possibility of temporary deprivation of the right to drive a car, to use this method against those of the Russians, for whom the ban on travel abroad is not a threat, because they have even a passport.

Really big decision in the new law is seen in one – to reduce the period of transfer of information about payment of the debt (and the abolition of restrictions on travel) from the bailiff to the Frontier of the FSB.

 

This will be achieved by passing this information “on-line documents”, which translated into Russian apparently means email. Innovation, of course, in our time.

But it is will only be tested – that is an absolute guarantee that the 24-hour deadline will be met, no.

In General, the objectives pursued by the bailiffs, can be quite noble.

In addition to fines, including the traffic police, and tax debts, it also withdraws money, required by law to single mothers or citizens who have lost their health through the fault of others.

Because someone needs to do this systematically, it is difficult to argue. Even if, in reality, a large part of the money collected still goes to the state.

But it is strange to hear that the government has made it easier for citizens life when it just started to slowly correct their mistakes.

For example, the sum of 10 thousand rubles – it’s not like she came from the ceiling?

Since then, however, as it was installed, prices, wages and the exchange rate has changed dramatically. But change it upwards just now.

About “electronic communication” between the FSB and the FSSP – it’s all a joke from the Soviet document, or a parable about the effectiveness of the work of “Mail of Russia”, which is a letter to Moscow can deliver for two weeks, and even may lose it.

But the main problem is not really the order of execution of the law “On enforcement proceedings”, and that good ends cannot justify those means which were used by Russian authorities for the sake of squeezing millions of their fellow citizens.

 

Russian bailiffs, lobbying for the restriction of rights to citizens abroad, like to refer to international experience and even on your site made a compilation on this topic.

The only problem is that from this collection, it follows that limits of such in the world – units, and even in Israel, where a possible ban on leaving the country without a court order, it does need “reason to believe that the debtor plans to leave the country, not pay the awarded debt.” Even in Kazakhstan to do this, the judgment. And only in Russia the ban is introduced

If the debt is not paid within 2 months, that limit will decrease to 10 thousand rubles. The same amount of “cut-off” from trips abroad will continue to operate for those who have debts for alimony, compensation of harm to health, property or moral damage.

Different well-wishers tried hard to lighten the lives of Russians and, for example, to cancel the right of a bailiff to suspend the driver’s license. However, before such “liberalism,” the Russian state Duma has not yet reached. It is only in 2015 have added to the legislation the possibility of temporary deprivation of the right to drive a car, to use this method against those of the Russians, for whom the ban on travel abroad is not a threat, because they have even a passport.

Really big decision in the new law is seen in one – to reduce the period of transfer of information about payment of the debt (and the abolition of restrictions on travel) from the bailiff to the Frontier of the FSB. This will be achieved by passing this information “on-line documents”, which translated into Russian apparently means email. Innovation, of course, in our time. But it is will only be tested – that is an absolute guarantee that the 24-hour deadline will be met, no.

In General, the objectives pursued by the bailiffs, can be quite noble. In addition to fines, including the traffic police, and tax debts, it also withdraws money, required by law to single mothers or citizens who have lost their health through the fault of others. because someone needs to do this systematically, it is difficult to argue. Even if, in reality, a large part of the money collected still goes to the state.

But it is strange to hear that the government has made it easier for citizens life when it just started to slowly correct their mistakes. For example, the sum of 10 thousand rubles – it’s not like she came from the ceiling? Since then, however, as it was installed, prices, wages and the exchange rate has changed dramatically. But change it upwards just now.

About “electronic communication” between the FSB and the FSSP – it’s all a joke from the Soviet document, or a parable about the effectiveness of the work of “Mail of Russia”, which is a letter to Moscow can deliver for two weeks, and even may lose it.

But the main problem is not really the order of execution of the law “On enforcement proceedings”, and that good ends cannot justify those means which were used by Russian authorities for the sake of squeezing millions of their fellow citizens.

I want to say that the Soviet Union as a textbook – from the point of view of violation of the right to freedom of movement – the state has long been dead, but his cause in modern Russia lives.

Russian bailiffs, lobbying for the restriction of rights to citizens abroad, like to refer to international experience and even on your site made a compilation on this topic. The only problem is that from this collection, it follows that limits of such in the world – units, and even in Israel, where a possible ban on leaving the country without a court order, it does need “reason to believe that the debtor plans to leave the country, not pay the awarded debt.” Even in Kazakhstan to do this, the judgment. And only in Russia the ban is introduced

almost automatically for thousands of people, in most cases without trial.

For reference: at the moment our database of debtors FSR are more than 1.6 million people and the number is growing as the economic crisis in Russia to lower the income of a significant part of the population. This – not to mention several million carriers of state secrets, judges, intelligence personnel and law enforcement agencies, which may not, without permission to go abroad.

Similar on the scale of the ban on leaving the country is not in any even a very authoritarian country. Unless you can remember Turkey, where a failed coup attempt allowed the authorities to prohibit to leave hundreds of thousands of soldiers, policemen, judges, government officials, journalists, public figures, etc. But even there it was done after the imposition of emergency in the country, which is then continuously extended.

Russia, as it turns out, living in constant emergency mode. And its citizens are constantly limited in their rights, is not surprised.

Ivan Preobrazhensky

Two guests of St. Petersburg appealed to the local resident with a question – what else is there interesting to visit in Petersburg. For all of the proposed routes of the guest were told that were there already.

Then a local resident advised them to go for a day or two to Finland and see the local sights, the benefit of that from St. Petersburg to Finland can be reached quickly and without hassle.

To this offer the guests replied that they are prohibited from traveling abroad due to their work.

Impressed not only the ban, and their relaxed attitude to this prohibition. In their words, a glimpse of some pride that they do not anyhow any, they elect and that they are the keepers of state secrets.

It turned out that this small guards working in the FPS.

Usual case, confirming once again that the dream of a slave is not freedom, but the opportunity to become a warden.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here