By numerous estimates, American analysts (and their minions) the U.S. army is the strongest in the world, both for individual indicators and overall size of the military budget, in number, in equipment, on the introduction of new technologies for military training…
Our army is so “the very best” claim in the USA that we are ready to fight with the whole world at the same time! Well, as they say, want not harmful… And what do we see actually?
But actually all is far not the best way for American warriors. Moreover, according to the British Daily Telegraph, the Americans HUMILIATED the Russians “air hooligans”, not only in the Baltic sea, but also in Syria.
But, excuse me, please, HOW CAN I HUMILIATE the STRONGEST?
The strongest you can attempt to humiliate, receiving such a poor guy, that will not find strongest you cannot humiliate a priori. About the attempt to humiliate the strongest from the weakest people say so, ran into rudeness or found adventure on his ass. In any case, if this is attempted in both moral in physical terms in the loser is the one who is weaker.
But here, the Brits are trying to convince the world that the Russian aircraft VC, carrying out strikes against the Islamists, acting provocative in relation to the planes of the Western coalition.
Analysts at Chatham House, arguing that the favorite targets of the Russian pilots in Syria were American F-16 fighter jets, strongly pytajutsja to accuse Russia in violation of international agreements and Russian pilots in an aggressive and unprofessional behavior: “Russia has violated the agreement with the USA, allowing its combat aircraft to carry out “false attacks” on American aircraft in the Syrian sky”.
And here, stop, stop! Let’s have a little more…
First, what do U.S. military aircraft (fighters!) in Syrian airspace? If Russian military aircraft are in Syria at the OFFICIAL INVITATION of the Syrian authorities, who of the officials of the country invited the US and its allies?
Secondly, that American fighters are doing in Syrian skies? Against whom are they going to fight? Against aircraft DAYS, which is not in sight? Or is it the main goal for them are aircraft of the Russian space forces? Rhetorical questions obviously…
Thirdly, the British somehow “forget” that in the air force of Turkey are the same F-16, one of which was meanly shot down Russian su-24.
It is therefore not surprising that Russian fighter jets “rush” first appeared in the Syrian sky “phantom” in the hope “to drink blood” in retaliation for the downed Russian plane a, making sure that it is American, with regret, leave aside. Well, the fact that the American “aces” pants are wet, it is a problem American “aces”, but not Russian pilots…
From all this we can draw only one conclusion: the Western coalition military professional actions of the Russian pilots cause itching in one place – against the background of NATO pilots look student dropouts. So the West, justifying the incompetence “of democratic pilots” because they are “strictly by the rules” (and therefore their actions are not so effective), accuses Russian pilots in adventurous activities.
(Does the West still did not understand that the whole strength of the Russian army was ALWAYS IN NEPREDSKAZUEMOST of HER ACTIONS?)
Can anyone explain me how is possible to operate in Syria NATO aircraft “by the rules” if they are there ILLEGALLY? )))
The most interesting thing in this “tempest in a teapot” is that screaming about “Russian lawlessness” in Syria, ONLY the BRITISH and the Americans are silent, as if typed into the mouth water. Why is it so?
To explain the silence of the U.S. the fact that they are really Russian VC by his actions “put in the corner”, and therefore Americans ashamed publicly to admit it.
But the British, rushing to defend the honor of the uniform of his overlord, attempts to stab Russia, hit hard by the reputation of the USA – you can now listen to the instructions from the “Washington regional Committee”, which so offended and humiliated Russian “hooligans?
