Echidna Douglas: About the power rake and jubilant idiocy

9

I am sure that many of you, dear readers, have met this opinion, rather widespread in the nation:

In the area of domestic policy to our government a lot of questions. But in foreign policy, our President is brilliant!

Here about foreign policy, where we – “well done”, we are now thoroughly and talk. With facts, names and circumstances. You can safely stock up on coffee, because the two words are here to stay.

Ехидный Douglas: О власти, граблях и торжествующем дебилизме

Rake Number 1.

Dear, as you like what is happening in Ukraine? I do not like? Of course, this can not like. And who you think is to blame?

Americans? Poroshenko? Turchynov Yatsenyuk, right sector or some other local degenerates?

If the question is unclear, put it differently:

– If you have pigs and goats, which you left unattended and that in a few hours destroyed and dirtied all your garden with all your works, – who is to blame? Animals?

Or you?

If you think that to blame the animals, that you are a classic>>. Or else – “fucking patriot”.

But if you are able to look deeper into the events and start finding fault with yourself, this material will be very clear.

Let’s not talk about the bastard Kravchuk, one of the signers of the Belavezha accords. Today it is clear to us that this stupid fat hog was an ordinary Bandera, a nationalist, in the same nothingness as our Yeltsin, Shushkevich and like all of our post-Soviet liberal scum.

Let’s not talk about it simply because then, back in 1991 to see Kravchuk prototype Poroshenko or Turchynov was impossible, we were too far from our current insight.

But the coming to power of Viktor Yushchenko was impossible not to understand! In the eyes of the Russian authorities, in the eyes of the President began the process of rehabilitation of Bandera, flirting with the West, the promotion of nationalism and anti-Russian separatism.

Yushchenko acted in a vacuum. He relied on a significant Western support, and internal support in the face of those freaks with a goat’s tuft at the pig heads, which are now filling the Ukrainian informational and political space.

But it all started back in 2005! And lasted 5 years until 2010.

Knew that from the 5 years of Yushchenko’s government, the Russian authorities? What conclusions have you made?

No! Generally no!

A close friend and ally of President Putin, the then Russian President, it is important pociva as usual, appointed to Ukraine Ambassador of the Russian Federation of a Michael Zurabov.

The older generation remembers this “figure” on the crazy reforms in the field of health, numerous corruption scandals and outrageous human arrogance itself Zurabov.

Ambassador Zurabov was sitting in Kiev from 5 August 2009 to 28 July 2016, i.e. a full 7 years!

From June 2014 to April 2015 Zurabov represented Russia in the Contact group on settling the situation in Eastern Ukraine.

Enjoyed the love of the new Kiev authorities, because, as they Zurabov believed that the Donbas should be a part of Ukraine(!)

What did the majority vote? There are answers to this question.

According to the Director of the Institute of CIS K. Zatulin “…personal qualities Zurabov, his… self-confidence… not given the possibility to the Ambassador of the Russian Federation to enter the circle of people who could influence Yanukovych… Patronizing tone Zurabov stood out sharply against the background of Western diplomats who appreciated his blunders. The Ukrainian elites have the feeling that Zurabov considered themselves not… Ambassador to Ukraine, but representative of the President of the Russian Federation, “the Ukrainian Federal district”…”.

5 years, watching from Moscow the growth and development of Ukrainian nationalism, the Russian government in the face of “President” Medvedev and “Prime Minister” Putin, the Russian foreign Ministry and the Russian security services have been unable not only to understand the essence of processes taking place in Ukraine, but did not even bother to respond to them accordingly and sent an Ambassador(!) a person completely failed in a previous job as Minister of health of the subject, as far from diplomacy and from the interests of Russia, how far from the defense was a Cabinet maker Serdyukov, who is as odious and ignorant as they were. Chubais, sent initially to lead the energy, and then nanotechnology!

All the years of his “Ukrainian reference” Zurabov “toporder fingers fan”, the language of the 90s, frankly yawned and pretended to be a diplomat, which was never. And it happened in a country which is Russian Federation considered the most important economic and political partner, which has openly started its nationalist, anti-Russian and Pro-Western drift!

It is a reasonable foreign policy?

If Yes, then compare the “Ambassador” Zurabov with the ambassadors of the USA in Russia! With their level of professionalism and dedication to the interests of their country!

However, that’s not all!

Instead of having to learn the lessons of the period of Yushchenko’s government in Ukraine, and with the help of the new President of Ukraine Viktor Yanukovych, is clearly much more Pro-Russian than his predecessor, to begin the systematic cultural, propaganda, advocacy, special diplomatic, trade and other missions to try to enlist the support of Pro-Russian Ukrainian circles, finally, to push the need for Ukraine troops, Russia did NOTHING! Leadership Russia lost the Ukraine! It was completely unprepared for the events of independence, because neither then nor ten years before he did not bother to grasp the essence of the Ukrainian domestic processes.

And, in full accordance with the logic of the same ‘ 90s, was in a sassy confidence that money solves all issues and that “salvage triumphs over evil”, and everything else – is not serious.

That is why, in the midst of the Maidan, and a few days before the fall of Yanukovych, instead of to urgently address the issue with him on the military response to the armed, public speeches Bandera thugs and to restore the constitutional order in Ukraine (repeat here – in the Ukraine, which Russia has always considered its most important partner), Moscow, Russia offered Yanukovych…money!

All in the same gang of arrogant confidence that “everything can be bought”!

It turned out – not!

Loot not fight.

Russia is not counted ally, the Russian budget of three billion dollars (thank God – three, not fifteen!), and the population of Ukraine and Donbass – a couple of tens of thousands of residents killed in the war.

It is a reasonable foreign policy?

From the perspective of the incubator Patriotic humanoids is reasonable.

From the perspective of the neutral observer who is familiar with the state of things is not only unwise, but CRIMINAL!

Crime in relation to Russia!

 

Rake number 2.

Relations between Russia and the United States under Barack Obama clearly went wrong. Moreover, they quickly began to grow into a new “cold war”.

On the “bad Obama” Russian propaganda start fun to pull all the lackeys!

Efforts of professional Kremlin propagandists, politicians, parliamentarians and jackals choir paid sales of the “Patriotic public Internet” Obama quickly turned into the main enemy of Russia and of world progress.

No doubt, Obama really was not a friend of Russia. It is a fact not requiring proof. And much of what happened in the bilateral relations of the United States-Russia in the age of Obama, is a black page in these relations. It is clear to even the last semi-literate housewife.

But it is unclear here more.

To domohozyajka on the Internet, which is ridiculous rasuzhdat world politics, no complaints. She is a housewife. And the Government, the presidential Administration and the Russian foreign Ministry today, too, are people with the level of Housewives?

If so, the reasoning here is just unnecessary. If so, then nothing but the new shame and new humiliation, we’ll see.

And if not, then permit me to inquire!

How could it be that the Russian leadership was not aware of the ABC’s, the basics of Russian-American relations?

How could it happen that the role of Congress in shaping American policy towards Russia has proved to be for Russian diplomacy first mystery, and then the awful discovery?

Or those of the diplomats who were responsible for this relationship are not taught in MGIMO,

Ехидный Douglas: О власти, граблях и торжествующем дебилизме

what is the Supreme legislative body, a legal entity possessing the Supreme power in the United States is not the President, and Congress?

That the US President will NEVER be able to pursue an independent foreign or domestic policy without approval of Congress?

What initiatives of Obama it was because they were supported and implemented, in line with the Congress, and initiative trump torpedoed because they do NOT COINCIDE with this line.

The Russian leadership has not been able to understand that, although “inconvenient” the President is gone, and in its place came “convenient”, the CONGRESS REMAINED the same! And this means that the policy of the United States against Russia and other strategic adversaries of the US have not changed! “Obama,” LEFT! Because Barack Obama was an expression of the will of Congress. So, what would Hillary Clinton, if she were to win the election!

Barack Obama was a professional politician. He knew and the role of Congress, and that he is the first black President of the United States – will never be able to impose its will on Congress! To do that he had to be, first, white, and, secondly, intelligent and strong-willed, like Ronald Reagan, who overcame the resistance of the parliamentary opposition with great difficulty.

Trump is not a politician. He has no political sympathies or antipathies, time-tested and proven. Trump practitioner, a pragmatist, a businessman, accustomed to measure success by the quality of the talks and material gain obtained as a result of these negotiations.

So trump is certainly handy Russia. You can talk to him with the hope of understanding. He is not Pro-Russian and anti-Russian leader. He is an ordinary sane American.

By the way, it was noted by Putin himself after first meeting him on the margins of the summit in Germany.

But how could it happen that neither Putin nor the foreign Ministry did not understand that to start a relationship with trump, and through him with all the America with a clean slate will NOT WORK with the current line of Congress?

What neo-conservative non-partisan (or rather – non-partisan) group in the American Parliament will NEVER ALLOW such development relations (that it is now obvious to everyone, including our Housewives, and the elderly veterans of the private security)?

How could it happen that not only the names of the leaders of this very dangerous political movement, but even the very term “neoconservatism” is not heard in the statements of Russian officials? The Program and goals of the American neocons, long ago became an official course of American foreign and domestic policy and repeatedly voiced the American and world press, still remain a mystery for the Russian leadership?

How could it happen that, watching from the deadly, desperate struggle trump the Congress, the Russian authorities did not understand with whom and why trump is struggling, losing one by one colleagues in his administration and ideino bringing themselves to impeachment?

That watching it passively and powerlessly, our government did not venture openly to take the side of the American President, whose election was applauded in the Duma even 10 months ago?

How could it happen that in matters of “internal cuisine” of American politics, our foreign policy sages were so blind or indifferent?

I will allow myself to reiterate a thought already expressed here:

“The Russian leadership has not been able to understand that, although “uncomfortable” President Obama is gone, and in its place came “convenient” trump, the CONGRESS REMAINS the same! And this means that the policy of the United States against Russia and other strategic adversaries of the US have not changed! “Obama,” LEFT! Because Barack Obama was an expression of the will of Congress. So, what would Hillary Clinton, if she were to win the election!”

It is the very thing that absolutely did not understand the Russian leadership! Because otherwise, in response to the expulsion of Obama 35 Russian diplomats, Russia was OBLIGED (!!!) IMMEDIATELY send those 755 American employees of diplomatic missions, which sent more than half a year later! We were required to do so during the presidency of Obama to HELP Donald Trump, not to STOP him. To this demarche was another trump card of trump in the struggle with Congress, a puppet which was Obama and whose instructions were fulfilled to the letter.

Russia do so in November – December 2016, trump was able to say to his opponents that the destruction of the bilateral us-Russian relations was and remains the fault of the fanatics from among the neocons and their President Barack Obama !

And now we have to start from scratch!

Perhaps it would not have helped, but a powerful trump of the trump would have in his hands.

Instead, our power as a collective Mikhail Zurabov, the “raised hands” and, indignantly puffing out his cheeks, just as in Ukraine, was waiting patiently, everything will resolve itself fully without understanding the nature of internal processes.

Were expecting trump to power, Yanukovych! As a long-awaited retaliation “individual unfriendly Russophobic American interests”, the removal of the sanctions and return to “a productive dialogue”.

And waited for the next square! In the form of a new package of sanctions more severe than all previous!

Loot is not to defeat the evil in this segment of Russian foreign policy.

The reason is exactly the same:

Superficiality! The superficiality! Criminal unwillingness or inability to delve deeply into the political processes in the country, which is extremely important for us in the sense of international relations!

And the result is again lost to the country, missed chances and then “suddenly” remembered about the act Obama sent 755 to the Americans in response to….the sanctions, signed by trump, who OPENLY declared his disagreement with them!

That is, six months later (!!!) random, WE’ve STARTED a diplomatic war under the new President of the United States, and created him a new interference! Yourself!

The attentive reader should remember one of the characteristics of a “diplomat” Zurabov mentioned above, namely the one which mentioned that he played actually on the side of the square, when he stated the need for Donbass to remain part of Ukraine, for which he highly valued Kiev official nerds.

When, in response to the expulsion of Russian diplomats 35 we are proud and meaningful look, invited the children of Americans on the Kremlin Christmas tree, WE did THE SAME thing!

We, figuratively speaking, as one big Zurabov, Obama gave gifts. For the humiliation and the provocation of all the last years of his reign!

But Donald Trump we retaliated in full! Drove 755 members of the us diplomatic mission!

For what?

I am sure that Barack Obama was quite happy with the gifts. About trump – not sure.

It is a reasonable foreign policy?

About the mess that’s going on in the minds of the Russian authorities, well said Putin’s speech at a press conference at the BRICS summit in China.

Answering the question of correspondent of KP, the President said the following:

1. “The fact that Americans have reduced the number of our diplomatic Ukrajini, it is their right”.

2. “We will sue”.

https://tvrain.ru/teleshow/vid…

I want to understand what it is to sue?

From the point of view of the law all the Americans did was completely legal. Arrogant, cynical, insulting and degrading, but legal! And it was admitted by the President himself!

From the point of view of the Vienna Convention of 1961 was no violation.

http://www.un.org/ru/documents…

Russia was the owner of the buildings in San Francisco and Washington, and she remains the owner. And has the full right of ownership, disposal and use of these buildings in any way except diplomatic! But dipuchrezhdeniya status and its immunity under the Vienna Convention is established only on the basis of bilateral agreements and in addition, according to the same Convention, is the prerogative of the host country, i.e. USA in this case.

Link to the Article 22 of the Convention will not help, because there is the Convention of a separate article establishing the status of departmenet after she left all to a single, diplomats. And because it can be considered automatically deprived of immunity. Diplomatic immunity does NOT APPLY TO the RIGHT of ownership, use, or disposal.

It cannot be bought with money! It is possible to obtain or lose by the decree of the leadership of the country.

Russia can and has every right to deprive any of us of the diplomatic missions of the same status, even if they are owned by the United States.

And America will not be able to protest.

But demand from the US or Russia recovery of dip. immunity in respect of buildings in Moscow, St. Petersburg, San Francisco, or trade mission in Washington, neither America nor Russia are eligible for all the same Vienna Convention.

So what or whom to sue? The Vienna Convention of 1961?

It is impossible to buy waste the house. Yes, it is possible to negotiate. But it is possible and to lose. Similarly, as any Ambassador or other diplomat of any country is not insured from declaring him persona non grata. And then what? Also to go to court?

Because of these complexities, and uncertainties of the world’s diplomacy is not guided by appeals to the courts, and the principle of reciprocity.

Rights to which Russia is again lost, as SHE was the FIRST diplomatic confrontation of the pre-walk on a Christmas tree in the Kremlin in the company of American children of President Obama.

Here’s a reasonable foreign policy.

What is the policy, and these are the results.

For “patriots” – at the time.

And for the Patriots it is no good.

 

And the last one. About the cooks.

The current government loves, unequivocally, arrogantly laugh at the geniuses of the past. First of all, on V. I. Lenin.

Stupid giggle over Lenin, intentionally or due to General illiteracy redefining his aphorisms and his thoughts, for example, the cooks in the manual.

It is easier to understand than Lenin, who spoke very, very different:

We are not utopians. We know that any laborer and any cook can not immediately join the government…

We demand that training in the public administration was conducted by class-conscious workers and soldiers and to begin it immediately, that is, to learn it immediately began to attract all workers, all poor.”

“Can the Bolsheviks retain state power?”, October 1917.

To the point and not to the place of attributing to the founder of the Soviet Union the expression that every cook should govern the state, Russian power, itself not understanding this, have ignored the concept of LEARNING as you put yourself in the position of the most ignorant cook, when, razed the old Soviet diplomatic school, flooded the state institutions, the media and social networks hastily trained cooks, well-mannered in the understanding of “omnipotence dough” and contempt for their own history.

The public expected was not capable of anything except swinging the ladle unwashed unwashed Patriotic underwear.

It is not available, it is impossible to understand that the role of the “cooks” in the governance of the country according to the ideas of V. I. Lenin was their training in this case! And that the cook, learned to do running the country, is not a cook. In contrast to the current “administrative weight”, understanding Ukrainian politics at the level of the soup, and in the us at the level of the jeans.

Ехидный Douglas: О власти, граблях и торжествующем дебилизме

A trained cook is able to be a first-class diplomat, and untrained diplomat – just a bad cook.

However, this ground is unknown.

And not seen as mocking smiles, looking at her and the entire Russian foreign policy the author of the famous aphorism, nervously-shyly hidden from harm’s way behind the thick, tasteless, Kucharski painted Patriotic decorations.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here